I’m Cooked If I Don’t Change.

The Strategy That Got Me Here Won’t Get Me To My Goals

 

The numbers do not lie.

From 2020 to 2026 I grew my investable assets from $248K to $1.6M. That is a 37.5% CAGR over six years. By most measures that is strong performance.

But here is the problem.

To get from $1.6M to $10M in 7 years I need a 30% CAGR. That sounds easier than 37.5%. It is not.

WHY THE MATH GETS HARDER AS YOU SCALE

This is the part most people miss.

37.5% on $248K meant I needed $93K in growth that year. One good deal. Some appreciation. Savings deployed well. Manageable.

30% on $1.6M means I need $480K in year one alone. Same percentage. Five times the dollars.

It gets harder from there.

Growth Required Each Year at 30% CAGR
Year 1
$480K
Year 2
$624K
Year 3
$811K
Year 4
$1.05M
Year 5
$1.37M
Year 6
$1.78M
Year 7
$2.32M

By year seven I need to generate $2.3M in growth in a single year. That is not a rounding error. That is a completely different business.

The strategy that got me to $1.6M was built for $93K years. It was not built for $2.3M years. That is why it has to change.

INVESTING: REAL ESTATE

Buy and hold was the plan. Find a property. Put 20-25% down. Rent it. Repeat. I have done this a bunch of times.

The theory was sound. Accumulate doors. Build equity. Let appreciation do the work.

The reality was messier. Cash flow eaten by capital expenditures and operating costs. Equity building slowly. Capital tied up in down payments that could have been deployed elsewhere.

The deeper problem is velocity. Putting 25% down on a $200K property ties up $50K. That $50K sitting in one deal is $50K not working somewhere else. At scale that math compounds against you.

I am now considering more efficient ways to deploy capital in real estate. 1031 exchanges: moving equity from underperforming assets into higher returning ones without triggering a taxable event. Cost segregation studies: accelerating depreciation to reduce taxable income and free up cash flow sooner. And exploring shorter cycle strategies like flips where capital moves faster and returns are realized sooner.

The buy and hold approach was not wrong. It built the foundation. It just cannot carry the next phase alone.

INVESTING: SECURITIES

I had the background. I put in the work. Business school. Wall Street. A willingness to grind that most people do not have. I thought that gave me an edge in the markets. Turns out I still needed to pack a lunch.

What the book Random Walk Down Wall Street laid out clearly, and what the data continues to confirm, is that markets are largely efficient. Not perfectly efficient. Efficient enough. Efficient enough that generating consistent alpha is an enormous feat for even the most sophisticated investors in the world.

 

Over the last 15 years more than 90% of active U.S. large-cap fund managers underperformed the S&P 500 index.

SOURCE: SPIVA SCORECARD, S&P DOW JONES INDICES, 2024

 

If that is the reality for teams of professionals with every resource available, the odds of consistently beating the market were always going to be steep.

Markets are efficient enough for me to focus my conviction elsewhere. Real estate. Business. Ventures where information asymmetry still exists and analytical edge still matters.

Today I index the securities and move on. The 401K and brokerage compound in the background. I deploy conviction where inefficiency lives.

INVESTING: EDUCATION

Six years of self education has a real price tag. Books. Audiobooks. Podcasts. Real estate programs. Real money. Real time. All of it.

Some of it was worth every dollar. The foundational real estate frameworks. The finance literature that rewired how I think about capital. The deals I did not do because I knew enough to walk away.

Some of it was noise dressed up as insight. The honest accounting is that the education tax is real but unavoidable. You do not know what you do not know until someone shows you.

WHAT HAS TO CHANGE

The foundation is built. Now the strategy has to evolve.

Real estate: Move from accumulating doors to optimizing capital efficiency. Better assets. Better leverage. 1031 exchanges and cost segregation where they make sense. Exploring flips as a shorter cycle income stream. The right contracting partner changes what is possible here.

Securities: Stay the course. Index. Compound. Do not overthink it.

New income streams: The portfolio cannot carry $480K in year one growth alone. Income has to grow alongside it. New business ventures. New partnerships. New industries I have not fully tapped yet.

New network: The people around me have to match where I am going not just where I have been. The next level requires partners, operators, and thinkers I do not fully have access to yet.

The strategy that generated 37.5% on $248K was the right strategy for that moment. This moment requires something different. Not a reinvention. An evolution.

 

"People look at you strange and say you changed. Like you worked that hard to stay the same." — Jay Z

Blueprint Cee

 

GLOSSARY

CAGR — Compound Annual Growth Rate. The rate your portfolio must grow every year, assuming that growth compounds on itself, to reach a target number in a set number of years.

EMH — Efficient Market Hypothesis. The theory that asset prices fully reflect all available information at any given time, making it difficult to consistently outperform the market through stock selection or market timing alone.

1031 Exchange — A provision in the U.S. tax code that allows a real estate investor to defer capital gains taxes by reinvesting the proceeds from a property sale into a new like-kind property within a specific timeframe.

Cost Segregation — A tax strategy that accelerates depreciation deductions on a property by identifying and reclassifying certain building components as personal property or land improvements, which depreciate faster than the building itself. This reduces taxable income and improves near-term cash flow.

Buy and Hold — A passive real estate investment strategy where an investor purchases a property and holds it long term, generating returns through rental income and property appreciation.

Previous
Previous

Deal 1: The 1% Rule, $27K Down, $146K Equity.

Next
Next

The $8.4M Gap.